Purchase price and working capital adjustments in M&A transactions
On an acquisition, it is usual for the initial purchase price offered to be stated on a 'debt-free cash-free' basis. In simple terms, this means that any cash in the business is retained by the seller and that all debt is repaid by the seller upon completion.
Most deals also involve a purchase price adjustment mechanism in relation to working capital. When buying a company on a going concern basis, acquirers will be keen to ensure that they are purchasing a business that will have sufficient working capital to fund its trading cycle from day one of their ownership.
In order to protect against the nasty shock of having to inject cash into the business on or shortly after completion, the buyer will need to establish the ‘normalised’ working capital levels. Once this target working capital figure has been arrived at, it is important to define what will happen in the event of the target not being met. Usually any increase in working capital over and above the target figure calculated at the offer stage and the actual figure at the completion date will result in the purchase price being increased on a pound-for-pound basis, and vice-versa in the event of a shortfall against the target figure.
Whilst in theory the calculation of the ‘normalised’ working capital level is straightforward, it is often not the case, with the determination becoming a contentious area to which buyers need to pay close attention.
The starting point for determining the working capital level of a business is to identify the assets and liabilities included in the calculation. Working capital is most commonly defined as net current assets (excluding cash) adjusted for any debt-like items such as corporation tax liabilities, loans and hire purchase liabilities. The target working capital figure can be arrived at in a number of ways, for example the figure at an agreed date or on a rolling-average basis, normalised for any one-off items that may distort the figure. However, every deal is likely to be different and therefore care must be taken at the outset of the transaction to agree the method of calculation.
Following completion of the transaction, it is usually the responsibility of the seller to produce completion accounts (which are subject to audit) as at the date of completion. At this point the actual working capital level on the date of completion will be known and can be compared to the agreed target number, following which a purchase price adjustment will be made.
In practice, these matters often mean that the final amount of cash paid for a business by the purchaser (and of course received by the seller) is somewhat different to the headline price offered at the start of the process. To avoid any misunderstanding and potential disagreements at completion, it is critical that the initial offer (usually contained in a Heads of Terms or offer letter) contains clear and defined terms in relation to the purchase price and any subsequent potential adjustments.
It is therefore important to take advice early to avoid such problems and reduce the risk of the transaction failing at the end of a lengthy due diligence process.
If you would like to discuss any of the issues raised in this article, please get in touch with Ross Lane,or your usual contact at Mercer & Hole
Date: 13th July, 2016
Articles from this Author
12th October, 2017
Outsourcing – working smarter
20th July, 2017
2nd May, 2017
How attractive is the current UK market for overseas investors?
28th November, 2016
Private company valuation
Contact a Partner
For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole