London: +44 (0)20 7236 2601
St Albans: +44 (0)1727 869141
Rickmansworth: +44 (0) 1923 771010
Milton Keynes: +44 (0)1908 605552

Navigating the Common Law Approach to Cross-Border Insolvency

Conflict of Laws .Net reports here that Look Chan Ho of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has posted Navigating the Common Law Approach to Cross-Border Insolvency on SSRN.

Just when legislations are being put in place around the world to cope with cross-border insolvency (such as the implementation of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency), the UK Privy Council in Cambridge Gas Transport Corporation v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings [2006] UKPC 26; [2006] 3 WLR 689 reminds us that the common law remains essential and is capable of development.

In summary, the Privy Council held that the Isle of Man court, having recognised a US Chapter 11 proceeding, had a broad discretion to assist in the implementation of that Chapter 11 plan, notwithstanding that this involved the transfer of shares in an Isle of Man company.

While the spirit of cooperation demonstrated by the Privy Council is commendable, its approach seems novel and may have significant implications for the management of cross-border insolvencies and for the general law. This commentary reviews the Privy Council

 

 

Date: 15th January, 2007
Author: Chris Laughton

SHARE THIS

Articles from this Author

Contact a Partner

Tweet

Foreign Direct Investment Post Brexit bit.ly/2iizp47 Andy Crook's latest article in our UK Inward Investment publication

Regulatory changes: what to look out for in addition to tax issues bit.ly/2xPMDfJ @lisajspearman latest article

Follow

LinkedIn

For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole

Click here to follow us on LinkedIn