London: +44 (0)20 7236 2601
St Albans: +44 (0)1727 869141
Rickmansworth: +44 (0) 1923 771010
Milton Keynes: +44 (0)1908 605552

Modified Universalism - Rubin & Lan v Eurofinance

Rubin & Lan v Eurofinance involved a "novel, though we believe inevitable and desirable, development of the common law" (according to Lord Justice Ward). Founded on the principles of modified universalism (insolvency proceedings are collective, dealing with all assets for all stakeholders, but jurisdictional differences cannot be ignored), it builds on the relatively recent House of Lords cases of Cambridge Gas and HIH Insurance.

In essence a foreign insolvency representative can have the English courts enforce a foreign insolvency judgement (such as recovery of a transaction at an undervalue or a preference) in circumstances where they would not be able to enforce an ordinary foreign judgement.

What the Court of Appeal has said, in simple terms, is that there are some special features of insolvency law that are universal and should be recognised and assisted by the English courts, wherever the insolvency proceedings originated.

More foreign insolvency representatives can be expected to seek the assistance of English (and other Commonwealth) courts.
 

 

 

Date: 24th August, 2010
Author: Chris Laughton

SHARE THIS

Articles from this Author

Contact a Partner

Tweet

Sporting testimonials and the taxman - specific charge to tax under post April 2017 rules - overrides Reed v Seymou… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

We maintain top 40 position in @AccountancyAge Top 50+50 Accountancy Firms 2019 rankings bit.ly/2W1gHxI #Top40Accountants

Follow

LinkedIn

For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole

Click here to follow us on LinkedIn