Surprising opinion on cross border losses
The Advocate General of the EU has published her opinion on the action against the UK for failing properly to implement the decision (Marks & Spencer’s case) on relief for cross-border loss relief case. The AG concluded that the UK is justified in principle not only in imposing stricter requirements for relief, but also in excluding overseas subsidiary losses. The opinion suggests that the change in the UK law following the Marks & Spencer case was not necessary.
It appears that, in the AG’s opinion, a UK company investing overseas is not in the same position as one investing in the UK and so can be subject to different rules.
This could get very complicated!
Date: 21st November, 2014
Articles from this Author
1st November, 2018
Budget 2018 - Changes for businesses
22nd October, 2018
Making the most out of your home? Rent a room relief
3rd May, 2018
Tax changes for non-resident corporate landlords
4th April, 2018
EMI options - a current risk
Contact Business Service Partners
Choose from the drop down menu below to select a Partner to contact.
Season’s Greetings and Happy New Year from everyone at Mercer & Hole pic.twitter.com/x4o1o9tbWP
For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole