I am getting irritated about the current media coverage on government officials and BBC presenters being paid via service companies. I read that the Treasury review on the use of service companies is expected to conclude that such schemes must end for full-time permanent staff, even if the arrangement led to a financial gain for government departments (emphasis mine). Am I the only person who believes that if a worker agrees to have his fees paid to a service company, with a 13.8% saving on those fees to the engaging company ("the employer"), the employer should accept the offer?
Where the employer is a government department it can always notify HMRC of the arrangements. There are provisions in place to tax service companies, so they have to pay PAYE on the fees as if they were salary, if the circumstances indicate an underlying employer/employee relationship.
Surely a proper application of the law would yield the correct tax result without increasing government costs at a time when we can least afford it.
Date: 29th February, 2012
Articles from this Author
20th July, 2017
Uncertain times for winding up transactions
3rd July, 2017
9th June, 2017
27th April, 2017
Government places Making Tax Digital legislation on hold
Contact Business Service Partners
Choose from the drop down menu below to select a Partner to contact.
For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole