London: +44 (0)20 7236 2601
St Albans: +44 (0)1727 869141
Rickmansworth: +44 (0) 1923 771010
Milton Keynes: +44 (0)1908 605552

Double trouble

A recent tax case highlighted HMRC’s hard stance on tax avoidance.   A PAYE savings arrangement had been undertaken by the main holding company that involved a further two group companies trading and hence paying corporation tax. 

The tribunals found that money had merely flowed through the new companies, which were ciphers or agents for the main trading company.  There never was any trade in either company; the money was employees’ remuneration.  PAYE was held to be due by the main trading company and it sought an offset for the corporation tax paid by the other companies.

The Tribunal accepted that the group companies were ciphers and had no substance but it did not accept that their payments of corporation tax had been made as agents or bare trustees.  Although the funds came from the trading company pot, they could not be treated as the same money; by diverting the money to the other companies, the funds acquired different characteristics. 

The Tribunal had no power to direct HMRC to set off or credit the corporation tax paid by Services and Retail against PAYE assessments.  HMRC chose not to do so voluntarily.

The potential cost of failed planning needs to be very carefully considered in this climate.

 

 

Date: 3rd July, 2017
Author: Cathy Corns

SHARE THIS

Articles from this Author

Contact Business Service Partners

Choose from the drop down menu below to select a Partner to contact.

Tweet

Michael Lapham shortlisted in the Money Management Financial Planner Awards 2017 bit.ly/2fL8VXBtwitter.com/i/web/status/8…

#Farming trading as a #partnership potential #tax pitfalls and tips @mercerhole Phil Fenn insight shar.es/1SHZhc @accountancylive

Follow

LinkedIn

For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole

Click here to follow us on LinkedIn