London: +44 (0)20 7236 2601
St Albans: +44 (0)1727 869141
Rickmansworth: +44 (0) 1923 771010
Milton Keynes: +44 (0)1908 605552

Modified Universalism - Rubin & Lan v Eurofinance

Rubin & Lan v Eurofinance involved a "novel, though we believe inevitable and desirable, development of the common law" (according to Lord Justice Ward). Founded on the principles of modified universalism (insolvency proceedings are collective, dealing with all assets for all stakeholders, but jurisdictional differences cannot be ignored), it builds on the relatively recent House of Lords cases of Cambridge Gas and HIH Insurance.

In essence a foreign insolvency representative can have the English courts enforce a foreign insolvency judgement (such as recovery of a transaction at an undervalue or a preference) in circumstances where they would not be able to enforce an ordinary foreign judgement.

What the Court of Appeal has said, in simple terms, is that there are some special features of insolvency law that are universal and should be recognised and assisted by the English courts, wherever the insolvency proceedings originated.

More foreign insolvency representatives can be expected to seek the assistance of English (and other Commonwealth) courts.
 

 

 

Date: 24th August, 2010
Author: Chris Laughton

SHARE THIS

Articles from this Author

Contact a Partner

Tweet

M&H Financial Planning shortlisted for Tax & Estate Planner of the Year @FinanceAwards #Tax #EstatePlannertwitter.com/i/web/status/8…

Corporate Advisory Partner @ChrisLaughton01 latest post The Recast European Insolvency Regulation(the “Recast EIR”) bit.ly/2tNkDDK

Follow

LinkedIn

For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole

Click here to follow us on LinkedIn