Administration: prescribed part (ring-fenced fund) not distributed
A share of the assets subject to a floating charge is reserved for distribution to unsecured creditors in priority to the chargeholder in an administration, liquidation or receivership (s176A Insolvency Act 1986 - see below).
This share is known as the "prescribed part" or sometimes the "ring-fenced fund" and was designed to prevent floating charge holders from benefitting from the abolition of government preferential creditors by the Enterprise Act 2002. The share is quantified in accordance with the Insolvency Act 1986 (Prescribed Part) Order 2003.
The requirement to make this distribution to unsecured creditors is disapplied if, inter alia, the administrator, liquidator or receiver either
- "thinks that the cost of making a distribution to unsecured creditors would be disproportionate to the benefits" (s176A(3)(b)); or
- applies to the court for an order on such grounds and the court so orders (s176A(5)).
The first known case of the court making an order under s176A(5) is Re Hydroserve Ltd  All ER (D) 184 (Jun) Chancery Division Rimer J 19 June 2007, the facts of which are reported by Bank Law Blog here and by Law-Now here.
In summary, the court agreed that it was disproportionate to distribute a net £2,000 amongst 122 creditors at a cost of £3,000.
There is nothing startling in this decision but it makes clear that costs need not be wasted on trvial distributions.
s176A Insolvency Act
Property subject to floating charge
176A Share of assets for unsecured creditors
(1) This section applies where a floating charge relates to property of a company—
(2) The liquidator, administrator or receiver—
(a) which has gone into liquidation,
(b) which is in administration,
(c) of which there is a provisional liquidator, or
(d) of which there is a receiver.
(a) shall make a prescribed part of the company’s net property available for the satisfaction of unsecured debts, and
(b) shall not distribute that part to the proprietor of a floating charge except in so far as it exceeds the amount required for the satisfaction of unsecured debts.
(3) Subsection (2) shall not apply to a company if—
(4) Subsection (2) shall also not apply to a company if or in so far as it is disapplied by—
(a) the company’s net property is less than the prescribed minimum, and
(b) the liquidator, administrator or receiver thinks that the cost of making a distribution to unsecured creditors would be disproportionate to the benefits.
(a) a voluntary arrangement in respect of the company, or
(5) Subsection (2) shall also not apply to a company if—
(b) a compromise or arrangement agreed under section 425 of the Companies Act (compromise with creditors and members).
(6) In subsections (2) and (3) a company’s net property is the amount of its property which would, but for this section, be available for satisfaction of claims of holders of debentures secured by, or holders of, any floating charge created by the company.
(a) the liquidator, administrator or receiver applies to the court for an order under this subsection on the ground that the cost of making a distribution to unsecured creditors would be disproportionate to the benefits, and
(b) the court orders that subsection (2) shall not apply.
(7) An order under subsection (2) prescribing part of a company’s net property may, in particular, provide for its calculation—
(8) An order under this section—
(a) as a percentage of the company’s net property, or
(b) as an aggregate of different percentages of different parts of the company’s net property.
(9) In this section— “floating charge” means a charge which is a floating charge on its creation and which is created after the first order under subsection (2)(a) comes into force, and “prescribed” means prescribed by order by the Secretary of State.
(a) must be made by statutory instrument, and
(b) shall be subject to annulment pursuant to a resolution of either House of Parliament.
(10) An order under this section may include transitional or incidental provision.
Date: 3rd July, 2007
Articles from this Author
20th July, 2017
Recast European Insolvency Regulation
26th June, 2017
The Recast European Insolvency Regulation (the “Recast EIR”)
28th November, 2016
Corporate Advisory Services & Brexit
13th July, 2016
While every accelerated M&A is different, finding the right adviser is always essential
Contact a Partner
“Good luck to everyone who has also made it as a finalist, I look forward to awards evening later on in the year”-L… twitter.com/i/web/status/8…
For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole