London: +44 (0)20 7236 2601
St Albans: +44 (0)1727 869141
Rickmansworth: +44 (0) 1923 771010
Milton Keynes: +44 (0)1908 605552

Worrying tribunal decision

A recent case before the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) looked at whether or not a discovery assessment made by HMRC was valid.

The facts are that the taxpayer had incorrectly (albeit innocently) claimed to set losses arising from capital allowances in a yacht chartering business against other income.  Relief was not available, as he had not personally been involved in the business.

The question was whether HMRC should have been aware of the underassessment of tax before the enquiry window closed.

The FTT stated that, for the time limit to apply the factual information contained in the return must indicate an underassessment; it is not enough for it to suggest that further enquiries may be necessary.

More worryingly, the FTT added that an ordinary HMRC officer could not be expected to know about the existence of a rule which was of rare application and consequently even if the return had contained a full disclosure, the discovery assessment would have been valid. 

 

 

Date: 2nd September, 2014
Author: Cathy Corns

SHARE THIS

Articles from this Author

Contact Business Service Partners

Choose from the drop down menu below to select a Partner to contact.

Tweet

Michael Lapham shortlisted in the Money Management Financial Planner Awards 2017 bit.ly/2fL8VXBtwitter.com/i/web/status/8…

#Farming trading as a #partnership potential #tax pitfalls and tips @mercerhole Phil Fenn insight shar.es/1SHZhc @accountancylive

Follow

LinkedIn

For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole

Click here to follow us on LinkedIn