Surprising opinion on cross border losses
The Advocate General of the EU has published her opinion on the action against the UK for failing properly to implement the decision (Marks & Spencer’s case) on relief for cross-border loss relief case. The AG concluded that the UK is justified in principle not only in imposing stricter requirements for relief, but also in excluding overseas subsidiary losses. The opinion suggests that the change in the UK law following the Marks & Spencer case was not necessary.
It appears that, in the AG’s opinion, a UK company investing overseas is not in the same position as one investing in the UK and so can be subject to different rules.
This could get very complicated!
Date: 21st November, 2014
Articles from this Author
20th July, 2017
Uncertain times for winding up transactions
3rd July, 2017
9th June, 2017
27th April, 2017
Government places Making Tax Digital legislation on hold
Contact Business Service Partners
Choose from the drop down menu below to select a Partner to contact.
“Good luck to everyone who has also made it as a finalist, I look forward to awards evening later on in the year”-L… twitter.com/i/web/status/8…
For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole