London: +44 (0)20 7236 2601
St Albans: +44 (0)1727 869141
Rickmansworth: +44 (0) 1923 771010
Milton Keynes: +44 (0)1908 605552

A weighty matter - follow up!

Further to my colleague Roger Bell’s comments in his blog posted on 30 April 2007, the High Court has recently overturned the Tribunal decision that part of the fee could be apportioned to reflect the printed matter element (zero rated leaflet/books etc).

The Court has now ruled that the fee paid for the weekly meetings is consideration for a single supply of “weight loss management services” which is standard rated.

This demonstrates that it is becoming increasingly difficult to apportion income in cases of “apparent” mixed supplies.

 

 

Date: 22nd January, 2008
Author: Jane Stacey

SHARE THIS

Articles from this Author

Contact Business Service Partners

Choose from the drop down menu below to select a Partner to contact.

Tweet

Michael Lapham shortlisted in the Money Management Financial Planner Awards 2017 bit.ly/2fL8VXBtwitter.com/i/web/status/8…

#Farming trading as a #partnership potential #tax pitfalls and tips @mercerhole Phil Fenn insight shar.es/1SHZhc @accountancylive

Follow

LinkedIn

For the latest Mercer & Hole news, visit our LinkedIn page mercer-&-hole

Click here to follow us on LinkedIn